Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
Arcane magic is evil you all know it, Garagoth is the city of arcane magic and its well evil. Sorcerers and Wizards have no place in The Circle or The Northern Coalition.
Melkor of Mellifeur {GODS}, Banshee {GODS}, Warlock {GODS}
MrAsimov wrote:...one thing has become fairly obvious to me: NC is already full of a bunch of rogues.
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
Wow, I am glad everyone is jumping in with ideas. As far as rp goes, I don't see how neutral druids would ever be aligned with lawful goodies but that's the way it is and I agree with Bargeld that rp should always take a step back to balance.
MtainEer
Is that allowed in relic raiding?Bargeld wrote:Play an untagged toon from any faction you want. Hate my assassin? Come make a better one and use it against laufer some day.
That is true, everyone can just build in every city.Bargeld wrote:Lack of options is not due to the current architecture, its due to self-imposed limitations of the builders. My personal take on making toons nowadays, is for strategy. I want an arsenal of toons so that when I defend/raid I have options. Look at your opponents and build to defeat them.
MtainEer
Almost Heaven, WV
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
I don't think it is against the rules per say but it would be poor taste.MtainEer wrote:Is that allowed in relic raiding?Bargeld wrote:Play an untagged toon from any faction you want. Hate my assassin? Come make a better one and use it against laufer some day.
Especially as you could mess the defenders faction up which would be bad.
I would hope that any DM who sore it going on would impose some role play consequences for any player raiding his or her own faction.
Melkor of Mellifeur {GODS}, Banshee {GODS}, Warlock {GODS}
MrAsimov wrote:...one thing has become fairly obvious to me: NC is already full of a bunch of rogues.
-
Amoenotep
- Lord DM Supreme
- Posts: 4717
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:09 pm
- Location: in the mists of eternity
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
may was well give BG's to NC also...pally's back to AO...hell, why can't i be a drow in RK?
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
Just make sure I get my rngr/sinAmoenotep wrote:may was well give BG's to NC also...pally's back to AO...hell, why can't i be a drow in RK?
Death Dealers ::DD::
Laufer - Gemetzel - Force - Little Fist - Egil - Torture - Hatshepsu - Nemesis - Hierophant - Supernaut - Flesh Hound - Insurrection - Antithesis - Dead of Winter - Volcanus 2000
Laufer - Gemetzel - Force - Little Fist - Egil - Torture - Hatshepsu - Nemesis - Hierophant - Supernaut - Flesh Hound - Insurrection - Antithesis - Dead of Winter - Volcanus 2000
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
I thought gods could? Aren't they playing out of Neversummer City sometimes, which allows everything at all?Amoenotep wrote:may was well give BG's to NC also...pally's back to AO...hell, why can't i be a drow in RK?
Earnestly though, we are just daydreaming, no rule against that, is there?
Aiya Mielikki! CELEB ALCONTARI CUYO ANANN!
For the Glory of Torm! Clericus Liberatus Anno Dominis - Gloria Triadis!
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
Antij-Paladins for SL with all the pure bonuses of regular Paladins?
::DD:: Minister of Hatemongering and Enemy Carpaccio
:MADD: Resident SlackMaster and KittenPuncher
:MADD: Resident SlackMaster and KittenPuncher
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
Paladins of Tyranny are in Unearthed Arcana and make perfect sense... When used in conjunction with Prestige PaladinAlkapwn wrote:Antij-Paladins for SL with all the pure bonuses of regular Paladins?
Bargeld wrote:Overall, I think most would agree that a pure rogue is probably the worst build on the server.
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
After adding BG to NC, the only thing we're missing is an alignment changer to create the formidable pally-BG. Naturally, add in rogue to also allow pally/rogue/bg for highly RP-appropriate gameplay. And I'm sure it will make the game much more balanced, too.
Naturally, add in rogue to also allow pally/rogue/bg for highly RP-appropriate gameplay. And I'm sure it will make the game much more balanced, too.Bargeld wrote:It's been shown in past relic events even, if NC actually has a decent amount of players involved, they will win.
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
Pally/CoT/BG/Rogue/Sorcer sounds balanced to me. Lets make it gestalt too. 
Bargeld wrote:Overall, I think most would agree that a pure rogue is probably the worst build on the server.
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
Nah, my favourite is Bard PM RDD or Bard BG RDD - both very easy going builds, no cheese at all, both with dev. crit of course - and waiting for that 1 to appear in the save (if its activated).
Aiya Mielikki! CELEB ALCONTARI CUYO ANANN!
For the Glory of Torm! Clericus Liberatus Anno Dominis - Gloria Triadis!
-
frogofpeace
- PKer
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:14 am
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
You guys are crazy. All I want is rogue in NC - for their diplomacy skills, so we can more effectively "negotiate" with the unrighteous.
Three years of nursery school and you think you know it all.
- Dr. Michael Hfuhruhurr
- Dr. Michael Hfuhruhurr
-
Kromix
- Addict
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 5:13 am
- Location: Right next to your mom... :D
- Contact:
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
AHHAHA!!!
Negotiations as follows:
Convert or Die!!!
***sneak attack***
***sneak attack***
what did you say?
***sneak attack***
so, you said you want to convert?
***sneak attack***
are you sure...
***sneak attack***
***sneak attack***
are you evil?
***sneak attack***
no?
***sneak attack***
are you innocent?
***sneak attack***
***sneak attack***
Dies.
oh i guess you where innocent...
o well
Negotiations as follows:
Convert or Die!!!
***sneak attack***
***sneak attack***
what did you say?
***sneak attack***
so, you said you want to convert?
***sneak attack***
are you sure...
***sneak attack***
***sneak attack***
are you evil?
***sneak attack***
no?
***sneak attack***
are you innocent?
***sneak attack***
***sneak attack***
Dies.
oh i guess you where innocent...
o well
TGPO wrote: Call me a nazi all you want [...] it wont change the way I approach things.
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
Kromix wrote:AHHAHA!!!
Negotiations as follows:
Convert or Die!!!
***sneak attack***
***sneak attack***
what did you say?
***sneak attack***
so, you said you want to convert?
***sneak attack***
are you sure...
***sneak attack***
***sneak attack***
are you evil?
***sneak attack***
no?
***sneak attack***
are you innocent?
***sneak attack***
***sneak attack***
Dies.
oh i guess you where innocent...
o well
Nonononono, more like this:
Repent. Now.
"Wha- where'd that come from"
*30d6 SA + 10 divine damage + etc.*
"Ugh... What was that"
Convert. Or. Die.
"Who's saying this?"
*30d6 SA + 10 divine damage + etc.*
"Ugh... my nads"
Convert. Repent. Now. Or Die.
"..." *doubled over in pain*
You leave me no choice. Or die.
*30d6 SA + 10 divine damage + etc*x2
*dies*
May the gods take no mercy *kicks at corpse*
Bargeld wrote:Overall, I think most would agree that a pure rogue is probably the worst build on the server.
Re: Add NE as an acceptable alignment in Circle.
How about we trade CoT for Assassins there's yer Rogue class boyo's
there's yer Rogue class boyo's::DD:: Minister of Hatemongering and Enemy Carpaccio
:MADD: Resident SlackMaster and KittenPuncher
:MADD: Resident SlackMaster and KittenPuncher