Mining Monk's Uber Build complaint

[Shamedmonkey]

You guys are so funny it's unreal. For being such an uber builder Rufio maybe you should learn what stacks and what doesn't. The absolute best part is the more you claim it is right the dumber you look. Even if the numbers worked, which they don't, I also told him to make it. Keep going though, plead your case, I know many are entertained by this. I am sure should you ever make a real point a DM will notify me. Nice try though guys. Hahahahahahahahaha.

u mad

[Bargeld]

1 sorc lvl gives True Strike for +20 ab. Can't remember if it caps or not, but that would be a funny start if just looking to prove a point.

I don't think it extends either, but hey, 1 round is enough for a screenshot!

[cRaZy8or5e]

I have more screenshots to help as well, being at work means I can't post anything though. The main point mining is trying to ignore is I told him multiple times neither his word or a DM's word that his math worked would do, he had to make it to prove it. I tell you what, if you are dumb enough to make a toon using 6 +4 books and come within 1 ab of the 70 i will still give you a +2 book because I got you to waste 6 +4 books. I also having logging turned on and can provide the text of probably the whole conversation to a DM should it be requested, I will save the file tonight in case it's needed. Other than that this thread has provided about as much humor as it's going to from the TSS geniuses and I will let it drop on my end as TheEdge requested. Have fun ranting all

Ummm building it offline is making it, so he proved it.

All of those buffs do in fact stack.

So pay up or shut up.

[mining]

Well,

As I have indeed PROVEN I can make one with those stats, I believe monsieur owes me a +2 book.

The BAB is in fact 27.

Let me break it down for you:

Epic: 10 BAB regardless.

Preepic:

7 cleric gets AB on 2,3,4,6,7.
5 BAB
4 monk gets BAB on 2,3,4.
3 BAB.
9 fighter gets BAB on 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
9 BAB.
9+3+5
=12+5
=17.

17+10 = 27 BAB.

I can assure you that starting stats are correct, make it on a tester module and you comfortably get it there.


Also, as to "With the context mining needed to create this build", All I needed to do was PROVE I could make an AO or RK Scyther that got 70 AB and 80 AC. If you want to go all technical ", this screeny shows that I never needed to make it, or design the build, only prove it is doable.

EDIT: Yesterday, someone was saying "Oh, you should post on forums, name'n'shame. I ddn't really want to inspire 10+ pages of futile debate when it was clear that I a) had the build, b) it worked. It appears however, that Psiber feels the need to dredge up 3 or 4 pages of his mates going "Oh yeah, mining's build sucks". Frankly, we need someone who hasn't seen this crap as to now, Nonguilded, experienced players, SL/MA, that kind of player is who should be assessing this. They need to be shown the precise build, nothing else, and be asked to look for mistakes. So long as the assessor deosnt know the situation, all will be good.


Oh, and I win a small moral victory, because noone once said my build was not Uber as the title said ;p.

[weasel423]

Oh, and I win a small moral victory, because noone once said my build was not Uber as the title said ;p.

that is because it is uber-ugly... so you got the uber part correct

[Amoenotep]

my BAB is 27 on the Hogre abomination

[Amoenotep]

best i could do with hogre is 70ac 68ab for about 3 seconds...sustainable 69ac 65ab for 15-30 second bursts

[diddy33]

heh, and it doesn't do well against HIPSers, it runs pretty good though

[frogofpeace]

Yeah, I noticed it runs good, too - seems to port away from danger, too, is that the hogre awesome button? Or does that turn his opponents to chickens?

[mining]

Yeah, I noticed it runs good, too - seems to port away from danger, too, is that the hogre awesome button? Or does that turn his opponents to chickens?

The porting effect is a 21 monk 'feature'


Heh, I wonder who believes that and goes out to make a 21 monk

[Nyeleni]

Whats up with the little font crap? Not man, woman enough to place it clearly?

[cRaZy8or5e]

Whats up with the little font crap? Not man, woman enough to place it clearly?

It's for the visual effect, instead of putting *mutters under breath* or *in a small voice* or *whispers* something like that.

[Kromix]

Whats up with the little font crap? Not man, woman enough to place it clearly?

It's for the visual effect, instead of putting *mutters under breath* or *in a small voice* or *whispers* something like that.

[Chernobyl_Glow]

self portrait kromix?

j/k. that is one ugly animal. dc 50 fear aura pox.

- glow -

[Kromix]

self portrait kromix?

j/k. that is one ugly animal. dc 50 fear aura pox.

- glow -

That's Mining's Shifter