The Letter of the Law

User-to-User support and questions to the Developers and DM team.
Rufio
PKer
Posts: 1046
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:00 pm

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by Rufio »

I just want to say that I do understand the rules a little better than what I said in the last post. I was trying to point out how they can be confusing as written. There has been clarification posted a few times, but for those that don't read the forums regularly, just reading the rules by themselves is unclear, which is why you see a lot of people violating the rules because they just don't know any better. In fact, most of the general population of the server do not read the forums here at all and have no idea what exactly the relogging rules are other than the standard veng-logging rule outside of raids.
Alkapwn wrote: This is the way i've always understood it but unfortunately it's not being enforced at all....:( and i'm way to lazy to be watching and SSing logins and toon signon/outs while i'm trying to have a good time .
Yeah I have the same sentiment. Honestly I don't even care to worry about what other people are logging or even try to keep track. It takes away from the fun I am having. Even if I tried I don't think I could do it unless I am very familiar with what toons go with what player. For the most part keeping track of the logins of my guild mates is enough for work me.
Sebastian (TSS) Doc - Rufio of (TSS) - Dagr (TSS)
Raijin {FoN} - Arcadia {FoN} - Geb {FoN}

Carejo
Looking for group
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:56 pm

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by Carejo »

This is me in this thread.

Image
I still say get rid of all these silly PvP rules unless you can automate punishment, you're leaving yourself open for interpretation and claims of favoritism.
People are just going to do it anyway, and not get caught. Like they are now. For every person you catch vengelogging, I'm sure there's at least another.
I guess if your opinion is that the War on Drugs is a success,then you're entitled to continue on this sort of path.

Alkapwn
PKer
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 7:59 pm

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by Alkapwn »

Probably more like this
Image
::DD:: Minister of Hatemongering and Enemy Carpaccio
Image
:MADD: Resident SlackMaster and KittenPuncher

Korr
PKer
Posts: 1049
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:59 am
Location: Lawrence, KS

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by Korr »

Amoenotep wrote:factional chars are factional chars, relogging for defense only hits venge log rules when its cross faction...your tc char defennds nc then you relog another tc char to defend nc again. tc to tc and nc to nc are in the clear. that clear as mud?


if you relog to defend then relog to continue raiding it MUST be the same char raiding or you have to wait the 30 mins.


the "30 min rule" takes effect from your last action. ie: cradle drop off or drop off. uncontested or not....its considered a hostile act vs that faction whether or not someone defended. the npc's defended :)


anything else or more definition?
Amoenotep wrote:tc can relog tc chars all day long in defense

nc can relog nc chars all day long for defense

tc can't relog tc chars in nc or its venge log
you said tc to tc to defend NC is ok.

Then you said tc to tc to defend NC is not ok.


Which way is it? Unless I missed part of that somewhere?
Amoenotep wrote:korr is the greatest :(


ImageImage

User avatar
cluckster
Pk Bait
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:42 pm

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by cluckster »

Korr wrote:
Amoenotep wrote:factional chars are factional chars, relogging for defense only hits venge log rules when its cross faction...your tc char defennds nc then you relog another tc char to defend nc again. tc to tc and nc to nc are in the clear. that clear as mud?


if you relog to defend then relog to continue raiding it MUST be the same char raiding or you have to wait the 30 mins.


the "30 min rule" takes effect from your last action. ie: cradle drop off or drop off. uncontested or not....its considered a hostile act vs that faction whether or not someone defended. the npc's defended :)


anything else or more definition?
Amoenotep wrote:tc can relog tc chars all day long in defense

nc can relog nc chars all day long for defense

tc can't relog tc chars in nc or its venge log
you said tc to tc to defend NC is ok.

Then you said tc to tc to defend NC is not ok.


Which way is it? Unless I missed part of that somewhere?

It looks clear to me... :twisted:

Amoenotep
Lord DM Supreme
Posts: 4717
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:09 pm
Location: in the mists of eternity

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by Amoenotep »

Korr wrote:
Amoenotep wrote:factional chars are factional chars, relogging for defense only hits venge log rules when its cross faction...your tc char defennds nc then you relog another tc char to defend nc again. tc to tc and nc to nc are in the clear. that clear as mud?


if you relog to defend then relog to continue raiding it MUST be the same char raiding or you have to wait the 30 mins.


the "30 min rule" takes effect from your last action. ie: cradle drop off or drop off. uncontested or not....its considered a hostile act vs that faction whether or not someone defended. the npc's defended :)


anything else or more definition?
Amoenotep wrote:tc can relog tc chars all day long in defense

nc can relog nc chars all day long for defense

tc can't relog tc chars in nc or its venge log
you said tc to tc to defend NC is ok.

Then you said tc to tc to defend NC is not ok.


Which way is it? Unless I missed part of that somewhere?
your bold lettering was in the wrong place anyway, i put it in italics for you..if its not good enough

relogging for defense only hits venge log rules when its cross faction...your tc char defennds nc then you relog another tc char to defend nc again

which means YOU CANNOT RELOG OTHER FACTION CHARS TO DEFEND A FACTION OTHER THAN THEIR HOME OR ITS VENGE LOGGING.

your tc char defennds nc then you relog another tc char to defend nc again=THE EXAMPLE NOT THE RULE

relogging for defense only hits venge log rules when its cross faction=THE RULE NOT THE EXAMPLE
Mask, Lord of the Shadows
Gruumsh, One-Eye
amoenotep@hotmail.com
----------------------------------
Image

Chernobyl_Glow
Newbie Helper
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:21 am

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by Chernobyl_Glow »

"You can't triple stamp a double stamp, Lloyd!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYlU93vC ... re=related

pfft. rools.

- glow -

Amoenotep
Lord DM Supreme
Posts: 4717
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:09 pm
Location: in the mists of eternity

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by Amoenotep »

you can't fix stupid either...but we try
Mask, Lord of the Shadows
Gruumsh, One-Eye
amoenotep@hotmail.com
----------------------------------
Image

frogofpeace
PKer
Posts: 1237
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:14 am

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by frogofpeace »

git r done
Three years of nursery school and you think you know it all.
- Dr. Michael Hfuhruhurr

Korr
PKer
Posts: 1049
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:59 am
Location: Lawrence, KS

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by Korr »

But I could log a TC to defend NC.

Then RELOG an NC to defend NC.


Therefor bypassing the changing factions rule because Im logging in a home-town defender.
Amoenotep wrote:korr is the greatest :(


ImageImage

frogofpeace
PKer
Posts: 1237
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:14 am

Re: The Letter of the Law

Post by frogofpeace »

I thought that was always allowed, in any situation.

Except for you - Daeron don't need your stinkin anarchists :P
Three years of nursery school and you think you know it all.
- Dr. Michael Hfuhruhurr

Locked

Return to “NS4 Help and Support”