Yeah I have the same sentiment. Honestly I don't even care to worry about what other people are logging or even try to keep track. It takes away from the fun I am having. Even if I tried I don't think I could do it unless I am very familiar with what toons go with what player. For the most part keeping track of the logins of my guild mates is enough for work me.Alkapwn wrote: This is the way i've always understood it but unfortunately it's not being enforced at all.... and i'm way to lazy to be watching and SSing logins and toon signon/outs while i'm trying to have a good time .
The Letter of the Law
Re: The Letter of the Law
I just want to say that I do understand the rules a little better than what I said in the last post. I was trying to point out how they can be confusing as written. There has been clarification posted a few times, but for those that don't read the forums regularly, just reading the rules by themselves is unclear, which is why you see a lot of people violating the rules because they just don't know any better. In fact, most of the general population of the server do not read the forums here at all and have no idea what exactly the relogging rules are other than the standard veng-logging rule outside of raids.
Sebastian (TSS) Doc - Rufio of (TSS) - Dagr (TSS)
Raijin {FoN} - Arcadia {FoN} - Geb {FoN}
Raijin {FoN} - Arcadia {FoN} - Geb {FoN}
Re: The Letter of the Law
This is me in this thread.
I still say get rid of all these silly PvP rules unless you can automate punishment, you're leaving yourself open for interpretation and claims of favoritism.
People are just going to do it anyway, and not get caught. Like they are now. For every person you catch vengelogging, I'm sure there's at least another.
I guess if your opinion is that the War on Drugs is a success,then you're entitled to continue on this sort of path.
I still say get rid of all these silly PvP rules unless you can automate punishment, you're leaving yourself open for interpretation and claims of favoritism.
People are just going to do it anyway, and not get caught. Like they are now. For every person you catch vengelogging, I'm sure there's at least another.
I guess if your opinion is that the War on Drugs is a success,then you're entitled to continue on this sort of path.
Re: The Letter of the Law
Probably more like this
::DD:: Minister of Hatemongering and Enemy Carpaccio
:MADD: Resident SlackMaster and KittenPuncher
:MADD: Resident SlackMaster and KittenPuncher
Re: The Letter of the Law
Amoenotep wrote:factional chars are factional chars, relogging for defense only hits venge log rules when its cross faction...your tc char defennds nc then you relog another tc char to defend nc again. tc to tc and nc to nc are in the clear. that clear as mud?
if you relog to defend then relog to continue raiding it MUST be the same char raiding or you have to wait the 30 mins.
the "30 min rule" takes effect from your last action. ie: cradle drop off or drop off. uncontested or not....its considered a hostile act vs that faction whether or not someone defended. the npc's defended
anything else or more definition?
you said tc to tc to defend NC is ok.Amoenotep wrote:tc can relog tc chars all day long in defense
nc can relog nc chars all day long for defense
tc can't relog tc chars in nc or its venge log
Then you said tc to tc to defend NC is not ok.
Which way is it? Unless I missed part of that somewhere?
Amoenotep wrote:korr is the greatest
Re: The Letter of the Law
Korr wrote:Amoenotep wrote:factional chars are factional chars, relogging for defense only hits venge log rules when its cross faction...your tc char defennds nc then you relog another tc char to defend nc again. tc to tc and nc to nc are in the clear. that clear as mud?
if you relog to defend then relog to continue raiding it MUST be the same char raiding or you have to wait the 30 mins.
the "30 min rule" takes effect from your last action. ie: cradle drop off or drop off. uncontested or not....its considered a hostile act vs that faction whether or not someone defended. the npc's defended
anything else or more definition?you said tc to tc to defend NC is ok.Amoenotep wrote:tc can relog tc chars all day long in defense
nc can relog nc chars all day long for defense
tc can't relog tc chars in nc or its venge log
Then you said tc to tc to defend NC is not ok.
Which way is it? Unless I missed part of that somewhere?
It looks clear to me...
-
- Lord DM Supreme
- Posts: 4717
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:09 pm
- Location: in the mists of eternity
Re: The Letter of the Law
your bold lettering was in the wrong place anyway, i put it in italics for you..if its not good enoughKorr wrote:Amoenotep wrote:factional chars are factional chars, relogging for defense only hits venge log rules when its cross faction...your tc char defennds nc then you relog another tc char to defend nc again. tc to tc and nc to nc are in the clear. that clear as mud?
if you relog to defend then relog to continue raiding it MUST be the same char raiding or you have to wait the 30 mins.
the "30 min rule" takes effect from your last action. ie: cradle drop off or drop off. uncontested or not....its considered a hostile act vs that faction whether or not someone defended. the npc's defended
anything else or more definition?you said tc to tc to defend NC is ok.Amoenotep wrote:tc can relog tc chars all day long in defense
nc can relog nc chars all day long for defense
tc can't relog tc chars in nc or its venge log
Then you said tc to tc to defend NC is not ok.
Which way is it? Unless I missed part of that somewhere?
relogging for defense only hits venge log rules when its cross faction...your tc char defennds nc then you relog another tc char to defend nc again
which means YOU CANNOT RELOG OTHER FACTION CHARS TO DEFEND A FACTION OTHER THAN THEIR HOME OR ITS VENGE LOGGING.
your tc char defennds nc then you relog another tc char to defend nc again=THE EXAMPLE NOT THE RULE
relogging for defense only hits venge log rules when its cross faction=THE RULE NOT THE EXAMPLE
-
- Newbie Helper
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:21 am
Re: The Letter of the Law
"You can't triple stamp a double stamp, Lloyd!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYlU93vC ... re=related
pfft. rools.
- glow -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYlU93vC ... re=related
pfft. rools.
- glow -
-
- Lord DM Supreme
- Posts: 4717
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:09 pm
- Location: in the mists of eternity
Re: The Letter of the Law
you can't fix stupid either...but we try
-
- PKer
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:14 am
Re: The Letter of the Law
git r done
Three years of nursery school and you think you know it all.
- Dr. Michael Hfuhruhurr
- Dr. Michael Hfuhruhurr
Re: The Letter of the Law
But I could log a TC to defend NC.
Then RELOG an NC to defend NC.
Therefor bypassing the changing factions rule because Im logging in a home-town defender.
Then RELOG an NC to defend NC.
Therefor bypassing the changing factions rule because Im logging in a home-town defender.
Amoenotep wrote:korr is the greatest
-
- PKer
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:14 am
Re: The Letter of the Law
I thought that was always allowed, in any situation.
Except for you - Daeron don't need your stinkin anarchists
Except for you - Daeron don't need your stinkin anarchists
Three years of nursery school and you think you know it all.
- Dr. Michael Hfuhruhurr
- Dr. Michael Hfuhruhurr