This is just a request that maybe if the DMs can't get together before logging on, that they would at least believe the players when they say a DM has just reset the relics for an event. When one DM does something and another resets the server in the middle of it, it makes it a bit frustrating for the players who are working hard to complete it. And a simple request to hold off on the server reset should not turn into an arguement about whether or not the other DM was just on. Im sorry but I don't enjoy it being insinuated that I was lying to the DM.
Misunderstanding maybe but at least take the time to find out.
Getting on the same page?
Getting on the same page?
As Always,
Poet
***If one can not say anything non-insulting and/or degrading about someone else, regardless of the reasons, then one should simply remain silent. Especially on our boards - let's remain civil, folks. - Mentarch***
Poet
***If one can not say anything non-insulting and/or degrading about someone else, regardless of the reasons, then one should simply remain silent. Especially on our boards - let's remain civil, folks. - Mentarch***
-
MasterYoda
- PKer
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:14 pm
on kind of the same note I have noticed that some of the pvp rules and standards seem to be a little different from primary ns4 to reflections.
it seems hard when u are so used to doing one thind IE pking during relic raisd , killing same faction members for becoming a enimy to ur guils ... etc.... are almost shunned upon on the exact same module but different dm team.
no I am in no way arguing with dm judgement and none has been passed against me to make this comment but I can almost forsee problems with certain situations when one dm says its ok then another says its not.
I fully agree that the dm on has full responsibility and final say on everything, but I think it would be helpful if they were all at least on the same chapter, same page might be a bit much to ask since like players , dms have different playing styles.
it seems hard when u are so used to doing one thind IE pking during relic raisd , killing same faction members for becoming a enimy to ur guils ... etc.... are almost shunned upon on the exact same module but different dm team.
no I am in no way arguing with dm judgement and none has been passed against me to make this comment but I can almost forsee problems with certain situations when one dm says its ok then another says its not.
I fully agree that the dm on has full responsibility and final say on everything, but I think it would be helpful if they were all at least on the same chapter, same page might be a bit much to ask since like players , dms have different playing styles.
TGPO wrote:Man, dont u hate it when yoda is right
Amoenotep wrote:yeah....he's a little right
Server resets take priority over just about everything else.
DM events are valid as long as the DM who set it up happens to be handy, no DM no event.
If I read that correctly it seems that you are asking the rest of the community to suffer with broken merchants and odd lag effects while one or two players try and do something or other.
Community as a whole, first, last, always. Every guild combined makes up part of the commuity, but not the whole of it, or actually even a majority of it so this makes for a null argument before it even gets started.
DM decided to reset the server. Thats where the conversation should have stopped. Anything that happened after that isnt on the DM, its on the player(s) who decided that the DM was wrong and just had to tell them so.
Clear enough now?
DM events are valid as long as the DM who set it up happens to be handy, no DM no event.
If I read that correctly it seems that you are asking the rest of the community to suffer with broken merchants and odd lag effects while one or two players try and do something or other.
Community as a whole, first, last, always. Every guild combined makes up part of the commuity, but not the whole of it, or actually even a majority of it so this makes for a null argument before it even gets started.
DM decided to reset the server. Thats where the conversation should have stopped. Anything that happened after that isnt on the DM, its on the player(s) who decided that the DM was wrong and just had to tell them so.
Clear enough now?
*Computers are alot like air-conditioners. They work great until you open windows*
It wasn't laggy at the time... merchants were working well and so were Dragons...
But you are correct, it ended when the DM reset it. My fault for trying to support the other event...
I appologise to all for this post. It was unecessary.
But you are correct, it ended when the DM reset it. My fault for trying to support the other event...
I appologise to all for this post. It was unecessary.
As Always,
Poet
***If one can not say anything non-insulting and/or degrading about someone else, regardless of the reasons, then one should simply remain silent. Especially on our boards - let's remain civil, folks. - Mentarch***
Poet
***If one can not say anything non-insulting and/or degrading about someone else, regardless of the reasons, then one should simply remain silent. Especially on our boards - let's remain civil, folks. - Mentarch***
