The battle took 2 minutes? And you had took a pure barb down to badly damaged? Sounds balanced to me
Thunderstone's Dragon had stunning fists in which he used on me before previous updates to Druid dragons.

The battle took 2 minutes? And you had took a pure barb down to badly damaged? Sounds balanced to me
Cahaal wrote:Dragons are hardly uber or overpowered, I've cut back on playing mine because I'm frustrated with hitting something and seeing it cause no damage, to both players and mobs.
Basically I'd like the people making the changes to remember that Shifters are not the same as pure druids when it comes to dragon shape and please make the changes accordingly. There are some TC and NC out there that today saw how ineffective a dragon is. Mine lost in a fair fight against a monk and I did no damage to the monk in the fight. I also did very little damage to a pure barb that beat me fair and square.
All the stuns did was delay the final outcome, because we both knew my dragon couldn't to advantage of it do to the little damage it does. So once the stuns were used up, Willow's barb started cutting loose with IKD's, and crits averaging between 150 to 250+ points of damage.Ryddwillow wrote:Thunderstone's Dragon had stunning fists in which he used on me before previous updates to Druid dragons.
You said it yourself, str-based characters are exactly that, str-based, which in turn allows that character to deal out massive amounts of damage. So naturally their going to have a lower AC. But what you, and the other Dev's did was unbalance the equation. If a dragon does small amounts of damage, then it's only natural that they should have a high AC. See, I can play on words tooLinuxpup wrote:Also, how many str-based characters can get AC into the high 70s? The fact is, dragons are really powerful, and I'd hope they'd still lose to a fighter or barb (of same level) since fighting is their speciality... while a dragon is meant to be powerful (and is), so is a fighter.
Amoenotep wrote:Interesting turn of events.....
Amoenotep wrote:Interesting turn of events.....